“dickless shitheads” “it's save (sic) to say that the only thing that got her the position were her tits and her pussy. that's it.” That's the way to win an argument. Ahem, our intelligence is showing.
Wait, I get it! A woman can’t possibly become successful unless she is a liberal. And, since be both know that Sarah Palin is not a liberal, then the only way she could have become successful is by whoring her way to the top.
***This message was paid for by the National Organization for (Liberal) Women***
of course, you've nailed me, i'm just some horrible, wife beating chauvenistic ass... yep, you got me there. well, i may as well just admit your points are 100% valid because suddenly since i can't see her lack of experience, her support of draconian and backwards policies as anything other than a weak point, since also i can't see the whole hypocrisy of the fact that she's even less experienced in dealing with politics than Obama is surely nothing to consider, i'm just a chauvenistic pig... plain and simple.
here's a tip, sweetcakes, try researching a candidate before you toss your vote in their hat. you might learn a thing or two.
“i can't see the whole hypocrisy of the fact that she's even less experienced in dealing with politics than Obama” This statement is totally false. She has more executive experience than Obama. If you look at the details of Obama's career, he has not done anything impressive except write to self-serving autobiographies, and he gives good speeches. Palin has been the executive of a city and state. You can disagree with her policies, but at least she has actually taken the initiative to be for something. You can't vote ‘present' when you are an executive.
The media has spent more time investigating Palin's associations in the last few weeks than they have spent investigating Obama's associations in the last 19 months. The result? 90% lies and distortions. When will someone ask Obama why he maintained a 20 year association with William Ayers and Jeremiah Wright, when he claims he doesn't agree with their political and social views? Obama claims he is for change, but look at what he is proposing; the same old tax and spend liberal policies. “Only tax the rich?” Hold onto your wallet. We've heard that one before. “Tax only corporations?” Corporations don't pay taxes. They pass them on as higher prices to the consumer. Only if you never buy anything will you not be affected. On the issue of national security, Obama is living in a pre-9/11 world. Hate Bush all you want, but it is his policies that have kept America safe for the last 7 years. McCain will continue the aggressive war on Islamic Terrorism. Obama will ignore it, just like Clinton did. Here is a tip when evaluating a political candidate. If most of the media is praising him or her, then your best choice is probably the opponent.
you know what, i could reply with point by point disarming your so-called "Argument" but i get the feeling that you're one of those lost souls whom will vote for all the wrong reasons.
"Those Who Would Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither." -Franklin
"The price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance" -Jefferson
don't expect me to reply and feel free to snipe back with a childish "i win" if you want. but this argument is over imo.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
xtremeroswellia) wrote2008-09-15 09:00 am
no subject
Wait, I get it! A woman can’t possibly become successful unless she is a liberal. And, since be both know that Sarah Palin is not a liberal, then the only way she could have become successful is by whoring her way to the top.
***This message was paid for by the National Organization for (Liberal) Women***
no subject
here's a tip, sweetcakes, try researching a candidate before you toss your vote in their hat. you might learn a thing or two.
no subject
The media has spent more time investigating Palin's associations in the last few weeks than they have spent investigating Obama's associations in the last 19 months. The result? 90% lies and distortions. When will someone ask Obama why he maintained a 20 year association with William Ayers and Jeremiah Wright, when he claims he doesn't agree with their political and social views? Obama claims he is for change, but look at what he is proposing; the same old tax and spend liberal policies. “Only tax the rich?” Hold onto your wallet. We've heard that one before. “Tax only corporations?” Corporations don't pay taxes. They pass them on as higher prices to the consumer. Only if you never buy anything will you not be affected. On the issue of national security, Obama is living in a pre-9/11 world. Hate Bush all you want, but it is his policies that have kept America safe for the last 7 years. McCain will continue the aggressive war on Islamic Terrorism. Obama will ignore it, just like Clinton did. Here is a tip when evaluating a political candidate. If most of the media is praising him or her, then your best choice is probably the opponent.
no subject
"Those Who Would Sacrifice Liberty for Security Deserve Neither." -Franklin
"The price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance" -Jefferson
don't expect me to reply and feel free to snipe back with a childish "i win" if you want. but this argument is over imo.